Council Traffic Report v0.4.7.7.6.5.4.3.2
Spatial LGA join
Council advocacy themes
Stonnington Traffic & Freight Intelligence Report
Independent council-area traffic and freight report generated from SCATS and TIRTL project outputs. Generated: 2026-06-22 16:34
SCATS rank
15
By long-period SCATS movements
SCATS sites
119
Sites spatially assigned to council
SCATS movements
17,510.8M
Cumulative SCATS movements, 2014–2026
Metro share
3.58%
Share of matched metro SCATS movements
Key findings
Traffic load
- Stonnington ranks 15 of 31 councils by matched SCATS traffic movements.
- The report covers 119 matched SCATS sites and 17,510.8M cumulative signal movements.
Site-level pressure
- The highest-volume matched SCATS site is Princes Highway East near THE AVENUE in Windsor, with 470.3M movements.
- The top 5 matched SCATS sites account for about 12.0% of the council's ranked SCATS site movements.
- The top 10 matched SCATS sites account for about 21.8% of the council's ranked SCATS site movements.
Freight evidence
- No matched TIRTL detector sites are available for this council in the current input layer.
- This should be treated as a freight detector coverage gap, not evidence of no truck activity.
No matched TIRTL detector coverage means the freight section is incomplete for this council.
How to read this
- SCATS evidence shows long-period traffic signal movements at matched signal sites.
- TIRTL evidence shows observed detector coverage where matched detectors exist.
- Use the map first to locate the evidence, then use charts and tables for detail.
Useful questions for council / DTP
- Which of the highest-volume SCATS sites align with current local traffic, safety or corridor priorities?
- Do the mapped high-pressure sites match the locations residents and councillors complain about most often?
- Should the highest-ranked sites be reviewed for signal timing, pedestrian safety, freight impacts or state-road advocacy?
- Would better TIRTL or freight detector coverage help the council understand truck activity more clearly?
Suggested DTP follow-up themes
How to use this section: these themes translate the report evidence into possible questions for DTP or council officers. They should be treated as prompts for further investigation, not as formal engineering recommendations.
Freight detector coverage request
- Why it appears relevant: No matched TIRTL detector sites are available for this council in the current input layer.
- Possible DTP / officer question: Can DTP provide better truck/freight evidence or detector coverage for this LGA?
- Evidence basis: TIRTL coverage gap in current matched detector layer.
State arterial / freeway interface advocacy
- Why it appears relevant: The highest-ranked SCATS sites appear to include state arterial, freeway or major corridor interfaces.
- Possible DTP / officer question: Which top-ranked sites are DTP-controlled or state-road interfaces, and what upgrades or operational changes are planned?
- Evidence basis: Top SCATS evidence includes Princes Highway East near THE AVENUE.
High-intensity site review
- Why it appears relevant: Average movement per matched SCATS site is high compared with other councils.
- Possible DTP / officer question: Are a smaller number of very heavily loaded sites carrying disproportionate traffic pressure?
- Evidence basis: Average 147.1M movements per matched SCATS site.
| Theme | Why | Possible question |
| Freight detector coverage request |
No matched TIRTL detector sites are available for this council in the current input layer. |
Can DTP provide better truck/freight evidence or detector coverage for this LGA? |
| State arterial / freeway interface advocacy |
The highest-ranked SCATS sites appear to include state arterial, freeway or major corridor interfaces. |
Which top-ranked sites are DTP-controlled or state-road interfaces, and what upgrades or operational changes are planned? |
| High-intensity site review |
Average movement per matched SCATS site is high compared with other councils. |
Are a smaller number of very heavily loaded sites carrying disproportionate traffic pressure? |
Suggested reading order: start with the data-period note, use the map to locate the evidence, read the charts for the pattern, then use the SCATS and TIRTL tables for site-level detail.
Data periods and interpretation
SCATS
Long-period cumulative traffic signal movements from the project’s cleaned SCATS layer, labelled in these reports as 2014–2026.
TIRTL
Observed classified-vehicle detector records from the project’s current TIRTL layer. TIRTL coverage is corridor/detector based, not universal council-wide coverage.
Spatial assignment
SCATS and TIRTL coordinates are assigned to official council/LGA polygons. Suburb labels are geocoded/locality labels and may differ from council boundaries.
Sensor map
Bright blue circles show matched SCATS traffic signal sites. Bright orange-red circles show matched TIRTL detector sites where TIRTL coverage exists. The black outline shows the official council/LGA boundary. Sites are assigned to council areas by coordinate inside the official LGA polygon.
119 SCATS sites
0 TIRTL detector sites
No matched TIRTL detector coordinates are available for this council in the current input layer. The map still shows matched SCATS sites.
SCATS site
TIRTL detector
Council boundary
Charts
Chart note: These charts summarise the same evidence shown in the tables. SCATS shows long-period traffic signal movements; TIRTL shows observed matched detector coverage where available.
Top SCATS traffic sites
Stonnington's busiest matched SCATS sites by cumulative movements.
SCATS traffic concentration
Shows how much traffic is carried by the top five sites, next five sites and remaining sites.
Top observed TIRTL freight sites
Observed truck volumes at matched TIRTL detector sites, where coverage exists.
Matched evidence coverage
Comparison of matched SCATS sites and matched TIRTL detector sites for this council.
TIRTL freight coverage
No matched TIRTL detector sites were found for this council in the current TIRTL input layer. This should be treated as a detector coverage gap, not as evidence that there are no trucks in the council area.
TIRTL coverage
No matched sites
Detector coverage status
Observed TIRTL trucks
No matched sites
At matched TIRTL sites only
Truck % at matched sites
n/a
Observed detector share
Top observed freight site
No matched sites
By observed truck count
Top observed TIRTL freight sites
No matched TIRTL detector sites for this council in the current input layer.
Method and interpretation notes
SCATS site coordinates and TIRTL detector coordinates are assigned to official council/LGA polygons using point-in-polygon spatial joins. SCATS figures are long-period cumulative traffic signal movements from the project’s cleaned SCATS layer. TIRTL figures are observed classified-vehicle counts from matched detector sites and should be interpreted as corridor/detector evidence rather than a full council-wide truck census.
The “Geocoded suburb/locality” column comes from the site lookup/geocoding layer. It is useful for orientation, but the council assignment is controlled by the site coordinate falling within the official council/LGA polygon.
Executive summary
Stonnington ranks 15 across Greater Melbourne councils by matched SCATS traffic movements, with 119 matched SCATS sites and 17,510.8M cumulative movements in the current project layer.
The busiest matched SCATS site is Princes Highway East near THE AVENUE in/near Windsor, with 470.3M movements.