Council Traffic Report v0.4.7.7.6.5.4.3.2 Spatial LGA join Council advocacy themes

Hobsons Bay Traffic & Freight Intelligence Report

Independent council-area traffic and freight report generated from SCATS and TIRTL project outputs. Generated: 2026-06-22 16:34

SCATS rank
26
By long-period SCATS movements
SCATS sites
54
Sites spatially assigned to council
SCATS movements
6,982.7M
Cumulative SCATS movements, 2014–2026
Metro share
1.43%
Share of matched metro SCATS movements

Key findings

Traffic load

  • Hobsons Bay ranks 26 of 31 councils by matched SCATS traffic movements.
  • The report covers 54 matched SCATS sites and 6,982.7M cumulative signal movements.

Site-level pressure

  • The highest-volume matched SCATS site is Princes Hwy West / Federation Trail in Brooklyn, with 382.0M movements.
  • The top 5 matched SCATS sites account for about 21.6% of the council's ranked SCATS site movements.
  • The top 10 matched SCATS sites account for about 35.3% of the council's ranked SCATS site movements.

Freight evidence

  • The current evidence pack has 22 matched TIRTL detector sites for this council.
  • Those matched TIRTL sites record 10.8M observed trucks, with an overall matched-site truck share of about 4.18%.
  • The highest observed freight detector is WGT - Inbound Main Carriageway, with 0.7M observed trucks. Its truck share is about 6.69%.
TIRTL figures represent matched detector coverage only, not a complete council-wide truck census.

How to read this

  • SCATS evidence shows long-period traffic signal movements at matched signal sites.
  • TIRTL evidence shows observed detector coverage where matched detectors exist.
  • Use the map first to locate the evidence, then use charts and tables for detail.

Useful questions for council / DTP

  • Which of the highest-volume SCATS sites align with current local traffic, safety or corridor priorities?
  • Do the mapped high-pressure sites match the locations residents and councillors complain about most often?
  • Should the highest-ranked sites be reviewed for signal timing, pedestrian safety, freight impacts or state-road advocacy?
  • Do the observed TIRTL freight sites require follow-up with DTP, freight stakeholders or neighbouring councils?

Suggested DTP follow-up themes

How to use this section: these themes translate the report evidence into possible questions for DTP or council officers. They should be treated as prompts for further investigation, not as formal engineering recommendations.

State arterial / freeway interface advocacy

  • Why it appears relevant: The highest-ranked SCATS sites appear to include state arterial, freeway or major corridor interfaces.
  • Possible DTP / officer question: Which top-ranked sites are DTP-controlled or state-road interfaces, and what upgrades or operational changes are planned?
  • Evidence basis: Top SCATS evidence includes Princes Hwy West / Federation Trail.
ThemeWhyPossible question
State arterial / freeway interface advocacy The highest-ranked SCATS sites appear to include state arterial, freeway or major corridor interfaces. Which top-ranked sites are DTP-controlled or state-road interfaces, and what upgrades or operational changes are planned?
Suggested reading order: start with the data-period note, use the map to locate the evidence, read the charts for the pattern, then use the SCATS and TIRTL tables for site-level detail.

Data periods and interpretation

SCATS
Long-period cumulative traffic signal movements from the project’s cleaned SCATS layer, labelled in these reports as 2014–2026.
TIRTL
Observed classified-vehicle detector records from the project’s current TIRTL layer. TIRTL coverage is corridor/detector based, not universal council-wide coverage.
Spatial assignment
SCATS and TIRTL coordinates are assigned to official council/LGA polygons. Suburb labels are geocoded/locality labels and may differ from council boundaries.

Sensor map

Bright blue circles show matched SCATS traffic signal sites. Bright orange-red circles show matched TIRTL detector sites where TIRTL coverage exists. The black outline shows the official council/LGA boundary. Sites are assigned to council areas by coordinate inside the official LGA polygon.

54 SCATS sites 22 TIRTL detector sites
SCATS site TIRTL detector Council boundary

Charts

Chart note: These charts summarise the same evidence shown in the tables. SCATS shows long-period traffic signal movements; TIRTL shows observed matched detector coverage where available.

Top SCATS traffic sites

Hobsons Bay's busiest matched SCATS sites by cumulative movements.

Top SCATS traffic sites chart

SCATS traffic concentration

Shows how much traffic is carried by the top five sites, next five sites and remaining sites.

SCATS traffic concentration chart

Top observed TIRTL freight sites

Observed truck volumes at matched TIRTL detector sites, where coverage exists.

Top observed TIRTL freight sites chart

Matched evidence coverage

Comparison of matched SCATS sites and matched TIRTL detector sites for this council.

Matched evidence coverage chart

Top SCATS traffic sites

RankSite IDSite / intersectionGeocoded localityMovements
15296Princes Hwy West / Federation TrailBrooklyn382.0M
21197Kororoit / FergusonWilliamstown339.9M
32880Westgate Freeway / WilliamstownSpotswood314.8M
42882Millers / Duosa / MarigoldAltona North237.3M
52512Princes Hwy West / GrieveBrooklyn235.8M
63483Pfw Sb Ramps / Kororoit CreekAltona204.5M
73503MILLERS near HOBBAltona North201.3M
82511Princes Hwy West / Burgess / Old GeelongBrooklyn197.7M
92881Westgate Freeway / MillersAltona North180.9M
103500MILLERS near EAMESBrooklyn174.0M
112509Princes Hwy West / Millers / FrancisBrooklyn168.0M
122968MILLERS between PRIMULA & CYPRESSBrooklyn167.1M

TIRTL freight coverage

This council has matched TIRTL detector coverage in the current input layer. TIRTL figures below are observed at matched detector sites, not a complete council-wide freight census.
Corridor caution: Freeway/bridge/tunnel/ramp detector: interpret as corridor coverage, assigned by detector coordinate.
TIRTL coverage
Matched
Detector coverage status
Observed TIRTL trucks
10.8M
At matched TIRTL sites only
Truck % at matched sites
4.18%
Observed detector share
Top observed freight site
WGT - Inbound Main Carriageway
By observed truck count

Top observed TIRTL freight sites

CSV evidence pack

Method and interpretation notes

SCATS site coordinates and TIRTL detector coordinates are assigned to official council/LGA polygons using point-in-polygon spatial joins. SCATS figures are long-period cumulative traffic signal movements from the project’s cleaned SCATS layer. TIRTL figures are observed classified-vehicle counts from matched detector sites and should be interpreted as corridor/detector evidence rather than a full council-wide truck census.

The “Geocoded suburb/locality” column comes from the site lookup/geocoding layer. It is useful for orientation, but the council assignment is controlled by the site coordinate falling within the official council/LGA polygon.

Executive summary

Hobsons Bay ranks 26 across Greater Melbourne councils by matched SCATS traffic movements, with 54 matched SCATS sites and 6,982.7M cumulative movements in the current project layer.

The busiest matched SCATS site is Princes Hwy West / Federation Trail in/near Brooklyn, with 382.0M movements.